Texas Supreme Court Slows Abbott’s Push to Remove Democratic Lawmakers

The Texas Supreme Court has rejected Governor Greg Abbott’s request for an immediate ruling on whether Democratic lawmakers who fled the state can be removed from office, opting instead for a longer review process.

Abbott had urged the court to act within 48 hours after House Democrats left Texas in early August to prevent a quorum and stall a vote on new congressional maps. But instead of a fast-track decision, justices gave both sides three weeks to file briefs, with responses due by September 4 — well after the current special session is expected to end, according to the Texas Tribune.

Abbott and Paxton Align on Lawsuit

Despite the delay, Abbott framed the move as progress, saying the briefing schedule moves Democratic leaders “closer to consequences.” His lawsuit targets Rep. Gene Wu of Houston, chair of the House Democratic Caucus, while a separate suit from Attorney General Ken Paxton seeks to remove Wu and 12 additional Democrats.

Though Abbott and Paxton initially clashed over who had the authority to pursue the case, Paxton has since said he looks forward to working alongside the governor to “hold these lawmakers accountable.”

Democrats’ Quorum-Busting Tactic

On August 3, dozens of Democratic members left the state, denying the House enough members to conduct business. The walkout was intended to block passage of the GOP’s proposed redistricting plan, which was introduced after pressure from former President Donald Trump. Trump has called for maps that would give Republicans up to five additional seats in Congress, bolstering the party’s narrow majority ahead of the 2026 midterm elections.

Democrats argue the redistricting push is a partisan attempt to cement Republican control, while critics note that Democratic-led states have employed similar gerrymandering strategies in the past.

Historic Move on the Line

No Texas legislator has ever been forcibly removed from office for breaking quorum. The Supreme Court’s eventual ruling could set a precedent with major implications for both parties — particularly as redistricting battles intensify nationwide.

Related Posts

Their acne is severe

Their acne is severe

A person should see a dermatologist if they have cysts, nodules, and deep, painful acne. They have late-onset or persistent acne: Late-onset acne may occur in adults…

Little Girl In Princess Dress Saved Unconscious Stranger She Found In Ditch

Little Girl In Princess Dress Saved Unconscious Stranger She Found In Ditch

On a late autumn afternoon along Route 27 outside Ashford, traffic rolled on as usual until a five-year-old girl in a glittering fairy-tale gown screamed for her…

Not Lonely at All: The Goalie’s Perfect Answer

Not Lonely at All: The Goalie’s Perfect Answer

On her very first day as a new P.E. teacher, Ms. Clark wanted to make a good impression. She stood at the edge of the soccer field,…

Just 14% Figure Out Correct Number Of Holes

Just 14% Figure Out Correct Number Of Holes

A T-Shirt Puzzle That’s Breaking the Internet An image of a simple t-shirt has gone viral online for one puzzling reason: how many holes are in it? At…

The Meaning Behind Shoes Strung Up On A Power

The Meaning Behind Shoes Strung Up On A Power

The Meaning Behind Hanging Sneakers Sneakers on power lines still grab attention, even if less common today. One theory says it began with soldiers who “tossed their…

A man who divorced his wife of 47 years

A man who divorced his wife of 47 years

A Costly Choice After 47 years of marriage, John left his wife, Nicky, in search of “freedom and adventure. ” He walked away from their shared life,…